SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

Pope’s role in Vatican financial probe again centre stage

Vatican City
AP

Pope Francis’ own role in the investigation into financial wrongdoing at the Holy See took centre stage on Friday in the Vatican tribunal, with witnesses saying he encouraged a key suspect to cooperate with prosecutors and a key defendant accusing him of interfering in the trial.

Friday’s hearing was one of the most eagerly anticipated in the Vatican’s “trial of the century,” given it featured testimony from one of the more colourful figures in recent Vatican history, Francesca Chaouqui. The public relations expert was summoned after it emerged late last year that she had played a behind-the-scenes role in persuading a key suspect-turned-star-witness to change his story and implicate his former boss, Cardinal Angelo Becciu.

Vatican trial Francesca Chaouqui

Public relations specialist Francesca Chaouqui, previously financial consultant for the Vatican, shows reporters documents, as she arrives for testimony in a trial in the city-state’s criminal tribunal, on Friday, 13th January, 2023. PICTURE: AP Photo/Andrew Medichini.

But the daylong hearing ended with an unexpected bombshell, as Becciu responded to Chaouqui’s testimony by reading aloud an exchange of letters with the Pope that suggested Francis himself continued to cast a shadow over the trial, even if inadvertently.

The trial in the city-state’s criminal tribunal originated in the Holy See’s €350 million investment in a London residential property. Prosecutors have charged 10 people, alleging Vatican monsignors and brokers fleeced the Holy See of tens of millions of euros in fees and commissions, and then extorted the Holy See of €15 million to get full control of the property.

Monsignor Alberto Perlasca initially was among the prime suspects, but he changed his story in August, 2020, and started cooperating with prosecutors, blaming Becciu, then the number two in the secretariat of state, for the London investment and other questionable expenditures.

When he was interrogated in November, Perlasca revealed that he changed his story after receiving advice via a family friend from someone he believed to be a retired magistrate who was working closely with Vatican investigators, prosecutors and the pope himself. It soon emerged that the retired magistrate was none other than Chaouqui, who is known in Vatican circles for her role in the “Vatileaks” scandal of 2015-2016 in which she was convicted of conspiring to pass confidential documents on to journalists.

Chaouqui has long harbored a grudge against Becciu, blaming him for being behind her “Vatileaks” arrest and prosecution. Her interference in the new trial, and interest in getting Perlasca to change his story, was widely seen as an attempt to settle scores with Becciu.



Chaouqui told the court Friday that she didn’t coach Perlasca to help the prosecution as much as to help Pope Francis understand what was going on “behind his back.”

Chaouqui testified that, through a family friend, she suggested Perlasca record podcasts of what he knew about a host of questionable dealings for the pope to hear, giving Perlasca prompts that he could answer. “This seemed the best way for me to let him know these things,” Chaouqui said, implying that she had regular access to the pope and provided him with a steady stream of information.

The family friend, Genoveffa Ciferri, for her part, told the court that Francis, as well as Perlasca’s parents, also encouraged Perlasca to cooperate with prosecutors. Francis and Perlasca live in the same Vatican hotel and have known each other since Perlasca worked in the Vatican embassy in Argentina, from 2006-2008.

“He was encouraged by the Holy Father,” to cooperate, Ciferri said.

Francis’ name also came up at the end of the day’s testimony, when Becciu expressed incredulity that Chaouqui claimed to have more direct access to the pope than he did as the number two in the secretariat of state. He read aloud a letter that he wrote Francis on 19th August, 2022, after he saw photos of Chaouqui being received by Francis during a general audience the previous day.


We rely on our readers to fund Sight's work - become a financial supporter today!

For more information, head to our Subscriber's page.


Becciu recalled that back in 2017, after the Vatileaks trial, Francis had told Becciu “You must never mention this woman’s name again” and had reaffirmed a ban on her entering Vatican territory.

“With yesterday’s gesture you, Holy Father, broke your much proclaimed commitment to neutrality in the trial,” Becciu wrote the pontiff. “By receiving her you have shown solidarity with her and indirect support for her accusatory theses against me. In procedural terms your act will not be seen as emanating from the pope but from the First Magistrate of the legal system of the Vatican State, and therefore as an interference in the trial.”

Francis, the same day, sent a letter of apology back to Becciu in which he said he had only agreed to receive her because he had been asked to.

He said he had “nearly forgotten” about Chaouqui’s history and had no idea she was involved in the current trial.

“I ask your forgiveness and apologize if this offended and hurt you,” Francis wrote. “It’s my fault alone, also the habit of forgetting nasty things. Please forgive me if I offended you.”

 

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.