Washington DC, US
Reuters
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect that allows state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of illegally crossing the US-Mexico border, rejecting a bid to block it by President Joe Biden’s administration.
The court has a six-to-three conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented, saying Tuesday’s action turns immigration enforcement – typically the province of the federal government – on its head.
Migrants walk along the Mexico-US border wall to turn themselves into the US Border Patrol after the US Supreme Court let a Republican-backed Texas law known as SB 4 take effect, allowing state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of crossing the US-Mexico border illegally, in El Paso, Texas, US, on 19th March, 2024. PICTURE: Reuters/Justin Hamel
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the Texas law will “sow chaos and confusion at our southern border.” Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott called the court’s action “clearly a positive development.”
The administration had asked the justices to freeze a judicial order allowing the law to take effect while its challenge to the statute proceeds in lower courts.
The Justice Department sued in January to block the measure, originally set to take effect on 5th March. The administration said the law violates the US Constitution and federal law by interfering with the US Government’s power to regulate immigration as well as running afoul of a 2012 Supreme Court precedent.
Abbott last December signed the law, known as SB 4, authorising state law enforcement to arrest people suspected of entering the US illegally, giving local officers powers long delegated to the federal government. Abbott said the law was needed due to Biden’s failure to enforce federal laws criminalising illegal entry or re-entry.
“Today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent joined by fellow liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote a separate dissent.
Republicans have sharply criticised the Democratic President’s handling of the record numbers of migrants caught illegally crossing the US-Mexico border. Abbott and other Republicans favour the restrictive policies of former President Donald Trump, their party’s candidate challenging Biden in the 5th November US election.
State crimes
The Texas law made illegal entry or re-entry into Texas a state crime, with penalties ranging from 180 days in jail to 20 years in prison. It requires Texas magistrate judges to order migrants to return to Mexico, with up to 20-year sentences for those who refuse to comply.
Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote an opinion concurring in Tuesday’s decision, explaining the justices were being asked to upend a lower appeals court’s “administrative stay” of a judicial decision blocking the law – a measure that is meant to be short-lived.
Barrett, who was joined by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said Biden’s administration could file another application to the Supreme Court if the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals does not issue a ruling “soon.”
Kagan wrote that the 5th Circuit’s use of an administrative stay rather than another mechanism “should not spell the difference between respecting and revoking long-settled immigration law.”
The 5th Circuit acted fast on Tuesday after the Supreme Court ruling, scheduling oral arguments for Wednesday on the motion to stay the case pending appeal.
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) vehicles are seen as officers patrol along the border wall after the US Supreme Court let a Republican-backed Texas law known as SB 4 take effect, allowing state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of crossing the US-Mexico border illegally, in El Paso, Texas, US, on 19th March, 2024. PICTURE: Reuters/Justin Hamel
Texas-based US District David Ezra on 29th February sided with the administration and agreed to preliminarily block Texas officials from enforcing the law, saying it “threatens the fundamental notion that the United States must regulate immigration with one voice.”
But the 5th Circuit paused Ezra’s ruling in an order that would have let the law take effect on 10th March, prompting the administration to file an emergency request to the Supreme Court. Justice Samuel Alito, acting for the Supreme Court, on 4th March had halted the 5th Circuit ruling – and thus the law – from taking effect, giving the justices more time to consider the matter.
We rely on our readers to fund Sight's work - become a financial supporter today!
For more information, head to our Subscriber's page.
Texas has tried to deter people who cross illegally under its Operation Lone Star using measures including deploying National Guard troops to the border, blocking migrants with concertina wire and installing a floating barrier over a stretch of the Rio Grande.
Jean-Pierre called the Texas law “just another example of Republican officials politicizing the border while blocking real solutions.”
Mexico’s foreign ministry issued a statement calling the Texas law “anti migrant” and said it would foment “family separation, discrimination and racial profiling.” The statement also said “Mexico will not accept, under any circumstances, repatriations by the state of Texas.”
Republicans in February scuttled a bipartisan US Senate deal that would have bolstered border security and tightened immigration laws after Trump pushed members of his party to reject it.
Opinion polls reveal acute voter concern over the situation along the border. Reuters/Ipsos polling showed Biden’s public approval level at 37 per cent as of 28th February.
– Additional reporting by MICA ROSENBURG in New York, KRISTINA COOKE in San Francisco and KYLIE MADRY in Mexico City, Mexico
