Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

In the US, lawsuit against McLean Bible, David Platt dismissed


A year-long legal battle over a contested election at a prominent Washington, DC-area church appears to be over for now.

On Friday, a Fairfax County, Virginia, judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by dissident members of McLean Bible Church who sought to overturn the results of an election for church leaders, known as elders. Those dissident members argued that church leaders, including senior pastor David Platt, a best-selling author, had violated the church’s constitution.

US McLean Bible Church David Platt

Pastor David Platt preaches at McLean Bible Church, on 18th July, 2021, in Vienna, Virginia. PICTURE: Video screengrab via MBC

The suit was dismissed with prejudice.

“I know that many churches across America have faced and are facing similar challenges during these days, and it is vitally important that we move past division and live out John 13:35, demonstrating love for one another and love for a world in need of Jesus,” Platt said in a statement Monday.

Rick Boyer, attorney for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said his clients plan to appeal.

The dispute at McLean centred around a failed a 30th June, 2021, election. The church’s constitution requires that new elders receive 75 per cent approval – and for the first time in McLean’s history, a new group of elders failed to reach that margin

The election came amid simmering unrest at the church, where political polarization in the wider culture seeped into the congregation – the larger “woke war” in the evangelical world. 

A group of critics that runs a Facebook group called “Save McLean Bible Church” claimed that church leaders had substituted critical race theory and social justice for Biblical teaching. Rumours had begun to circulate around the church that Platt and other leaders planned to sell a church building to a local Muslim congregation for a mosque.

COVID-19 also played a role. Some church members who had been attending online, rather than in person, claimed their ballots had been disqualified.  

Following the first failed election, a second election was held in early July, 2021, this one where members had to sign their ballots – which critics said violated the church practice of using secret ballots. In that election, the elders were approved, which led dissident members to file a suit.

This past spring, hoping to resolve the dispute, McLean leaders decided to discard the results of the July, 2021, elder election. They organised a new election for elders in mid-June 2022, using secret ballots. All active members were allowed to vote.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit objected, saying anyone who joined the church after the June, 2021, election should not be allowed to vote. 

All six elders on the ballot received at least 86 per cent approval.

Wade Burnett, a pastor on McLean’s leadership team, said the congregation decided to move forward together in a difficult time.

He told Religion News Service that the church believes it will prevail if there is an appeal.

“Every time this lawsuit has been filed or amended or refiled, it has resulted in a dismissal,” he said. “We believe the same thing would happen on appeal in this matter, as our church has now voted and revoted in ways that are crystal clear. We want to move forward in unity and we do not believe any appellate court would restrict us from doing that.”



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.



We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.