JACK JENKINS, of Religion News Service, reports that there is growing uncertainty surrounding how religious voters and others will engage with abortion policy as they head to the polls in the US midterms next month…
Washington DC, US
RNS
After the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in June, many Democrats despaired at the anti-abortion movement’s victory but expressed hope at the raucous protests by abortion-rights advocates and polls showing Americans outraged by new restrictions on abortion. Such frustrations, some argued, could help propel Democrats to victory come November.
“This cruel ruling is outrageous and heart-wrenching,” House Speaker and Democratic Representative Nancy Pelosi said in June. “But make no mistake: The rights of women and all Americans are on the ballot this November.”
Anti-abortion advocates listen to various speakers during the Emergency Pro-Life Rally for New Mexico in Las Cruces, New Mexico, on Tuesday, 19th July. PICTURE: Meg Potter/The Las Cruces Sun News via AP.
Yet, four months later, operatives who work with conservative Christians, whose political strategy has long centred on abortion, appear unconvinced that liberal passions will turn the tide.
The debate hints at growing uncertainty surrounding how religious voters and others will engage with abortion policy as they head to the polls next month, when millions will cast ballots in abortion-related referendums and choose between candidates who have staked out firm positions on all sides of the issue.
“I don’t think the abortion issue’s working for them anymore,” said Ralph Reed, head of the conservative Faith and Freedom Coalition, referring to Democrats. His group still lists candidates based on their views regarding abortion, he said, and outlines their stances on abortion legislation in messages to voters.
The debate hints at growing uncertainty surrounding how religious voters and others will engage with abortion policy as they head to the polls next month, when millions will cast ballots in abortion-related referendums and choose between candidates who have staked out firm positions on all sides of the issue.
Some campaign commercials are trying to make a candidate’s stance on abortion a litmus test for faith. In Georgia, a recent advertisement produced by the National Republican Senatorial Committee argued that Democratic incumbent Senator Raphael Warnock’s support for abortion rights (Warnock, a minister in Atlanta, identifies as a “pro-choice pastor”) is out of step with Christianity.
President Joe Biden speaks about abortion access during a Democratic National Committee event, on Tuesday, 18th October, at the Howard Theatre in Washington. PICTURE: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky.
But support for abortion rights has become increasingly visible in faith circles. Groups aligned with liberal wings of several religions have hosted rallies, protests and demonstrations with lawmakers. The National Council of Jewish Women met with Second Gentleman Douglas Emhoff, who expressed support for their cause. Plaintiffs in lawsuits against abortion bans in states such as Kentucky, where a referendum on the issue is on the November ballot, have cited their faith as a reason to oppose the restrictions.
At least one group, Catholics for Choice, is appealing to voters directly, unveiling a new guide that shows voters how to evaluate candidates and encourages supporters to cast ballots in support of abortion rights. They stress the importance of referendums on the issue, which will appear on the ballot in California, Michigan, Vermont, Nevada, Kentucky and Montana.
“Pro-choice Catholics don’t just exist, we are the majority,” reads a line from the voter guide.
That claim is borne out in a recent 19th News/SurveyMonkey poll conducted in September, which found that majorities of Catholics (57 per cent), Orthodox Christians (73 per cent), Jews (73 per cent), Muslims (63 per cent), Buddhists (77 per cent), Hindus (67 per cent) and non-evangelical Christians (64 per cent) all said abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Only evangelicals and members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints expressed majority support for making abortion illegal in all or most cases (65 per cent and 54 per cent, respectively).
Party seems to be a stronger driver than faith on the issue. A survey released this month by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 45 per cent of singled-out born-again or evangelical Christians believed the decision to overturn Roe made them more likely to vote in November. But only 39 per cent of evangelicals who call themselves Republican agreed, compared to 56 per cent of evangelical Democrats.
That’s less than Democrats overall (69 per cent), but it gives Democrats hope that Republican appeals to evangelicals on abortion will go unheard.
But questions remain as to whether concern for abortion rights will outweigh other factors. A New York Times/Siena College poll released last week showed likely voters were far more inclined to cite concerns about the economy (26 per cent) as impacting their vote than abortion (five per cent).
Faith groups that support abortion rights are also typically smaller and more sparsely funded than their anti-abortion counterparts, and while Planned Parenthood has its own faith advisory board, a representative said the group has no immediate plans for robust faith outreach to voters ahead of the midterms.
Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, speaks during a news conference to discuss the introduction of the Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act on Capitol Hill, on Tuesday, 13th September, in Washington. PICTURE: AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib.
Some Democratic leaders have also been shy about linking faith and abortion. In an 18th October speech in Washington in which he vowed to sign legislation making abortion legal nationwide if his party retains control of Congress, President Joe Biden made no mention of his own Catholic faith. Neither did the woman who introduced him, Dr Jennifer Villavicencio, an obstetrician–gynecologist who serves on the board of Catholics for Choice.
Biden and other Democrats may be wary of raising the ire of Catholic bishops, who have staunchly opposed abortion liberalization laws this election cycle. In Michigan, where Proposition 3 would codify a broad right to “reproductive freedom” in the state constitution, Archbishop Allen Vigneron of Detroit preached a sermon earlier this month celebrating the overturning of Roe v. Wade and calling on his fellow faithful to oppose the ballot measure.
“God invites us to say ‘No,’ to Proposition 3,” Vigneron said, according to the Detroit News.
Vigneron joined other Michigan bishops in signing a letter calling the proposal the “most extreme proposal concerning abortion this state or country has ever seen.” The letter was mailed to approximately 236,000 Michigan Catholic households, according to Catholic News Service, and the state bishops’ conference has since set up a website urging people to vote against the measure.
We rely on our readers to fund Sight's work - become a financial supporter today!
For more information, head to our Subscriber's page.
In September, Archbishop William E Lori of Baltimore, chairman of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, expressed support for a national 15-week abortion ban proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Representative Chris Smith of New Jersey, calling the overture “a place to begin uniting Americans regardless of their views on abortion.”
California Bishops have also spoken out against an effort to protect abortion access in their state, though Cardinal Robert McElroy, bishop of San Diego, told Religion News Service in August he expects it to pass, because, “in the particular, secularised environment of California, it’s very difficult.”
Abortion-rights advocates argue the bishops’ efforts may backfire, as they did in August when Kansans voted on an amendment to the state constitution that would pave the way for a potential abortion ban. Voters resoundingly rejected the proposal despite millions spent by Catholic dioceses and other Catholic organizations.
Bishops may be facing a similar uphill battle in Michigan: In September, an Epic-MRA poll found that a majority of Catholics in the state (57 per cent) support Proposition 3.
People hug during a Value Them Both watch party after a question involving a constitutional amendment removing abortion protections from the Kansas constitution failed, on 2nd August, in Overland Park, Kansas. Value Them Both was an anti-abortion group that wanted the amendment question to pass. PICTURE: AP Photo/Charlie Riedel.
Ralph Reed was unmoved by the projections about state referendums. “The reality is abortion has never really worked as an issue for conservatives in an initiative and referendum environment,” he said. “There’s a reason why the restrictions that we’ve passed on abortion, almost without exception, have occurred legislatively. It’s been done by the action of state legislatures.”
Reed added that in California, referendums designed to protect abortion rights would do little to increase turnout in the heavily Democratic state, part of a broader trend election watchers have noted in other Democratic-leaning bastions. “It’s not going to work to tell young female voters in California that their right to an abortion might be taken away. It’s just simply not true,” he said. “California is going to have the most liberal abortion law in America.”
But activists on all sides of the issue are leaving little to chance, doing their best to encourage voters to make the issue paramount.
“Abortion is directly on the ballot in California, Michigan, Vermont, Kentucky, and Montana,” read a recent tweet from Catholics for Choice. Referring to the election as “Roevember,” the tweet goes on to encourage supporters to “get out and vote,” declaring, “Your rights depend on it!”
