SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

World Court to hear Russian objections to Ukraine genocide case

The Hague, The Netherland
Reuters

Russia and Ukraine will square off before the International Court of Justice on Monday in a case that centres around claims by Moscow that its invasion of Ukraine was done to prevent genocide. 

Ukraine brought the case to the United Nations’ highest court just days after the Russian invasion on 24th February last year. Kyiv argues Russia is abusing international law by saying the invasion was justified to prevent an alleged genocide in eastern Ukraine.

A general view of the International Court of Justice  in The Hague, Netherlands, on 22nd August, 2023

A general view of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, on 22nd August, 2023. PICTURE: Reuters/Piroschka van de Wouw/File photo

Russian officials continue to accuse Ukraine of committing genocide. 

Russia wants the case to be thrown out and objects to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. The hearings, set to run until 27th September, will not delve into the merits of the case and are instead focused on legal arguments about jurisdiction. 

Moscow says Ukraine is using the case as a roundabout way to get a ruling on the overall legality of its military action.

Ukraine has already cleared one hurdle as the court decided in its favour in a preliminary decision in the case in March last year. Based on that, the court ordered Russia to cease military actions in Ukraine immediately.



In the hearings the court will also hear from 32 other states, all supporting Ukraine’s argument that the court has jurisdiction to move the case forward. 

“It is looking fairly positive for the court to find it has jurisdiction,” Juliette McIntyre, a law lecturer at the University of South Australia and ICJ watcher, said.

While Russia has so far ignored the ICJ’s orders to stop its military actions and the court has no way of enforcing its decisions, experts say an eventual ruling in favour of Ukraine could be important for any future reparations claims.

“If the court finds there was no lawful justification under the Genocide Convention for Russia’s acts, the decision can set up a future claim for compensation,” McIntyre said.

The United Nations’ 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as crimes committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”

 

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.