SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

UK independent body: China committed genocide in Xinjiang

London, UK
AP

An independent, unofficial body set up by a prominent British barrister to assess evidence on China’s alleged rights abuses against the Uyghur people concluded Thursday that the Chinese Government committed genocide and crimes against humanity.

The Uyghur Tribunal, made up of lawyers, academics and businesspeople, doesn’t have any government backing or powers to sanction or punish China. But organisers hope the process of publicly laying out evidence will compel international action to tackle Beijing’s policies against the Uyghurs, a largely Muslim ethnic group.

UK Uyghur Tribunal

Tribunal chair Geoffrey Nice, centre, delivers the verdict of the independent tribunal assessing evidence on China’s alleged rights abuses against the Uyghur people, in London, on Thursday, 9th December, 2021. The independent and unofficial body set up by a prominent British barrister has concluded that the Chinese government committed genocide and crimes against humanity. PICTURE: AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali.

Tribunal chair Geoffrey Nice said the genocide ruling was based on evidence that the Chinese government’s forced birth control and sterilisation policies targeting Uyghurs in the far western Xinjiang province were “intended to destroy a significant part” of the group’s population. The abuse was part of comprehensive policies directly linked to President Xi Jinping and the highest levels of the Chinese government, he said. 

Nice, a senior lawyer, previously led the prosecution of ex-Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic and has worked with the International Criminal Court.

“There has to be an intention to destroy, by the act of interfering with birth, a group,” he said. “The evidence was that a significant proportion of Uyghurs who would have been born will not be born.”

The Chinese Embassy in London condemned the tribunal as a “political tool used by a few anti-China and separatist elements to deceive and mislead the public.” The embassy also said in a statement that the policies in Xinjiang were aimed at fighting terrorism and preventing radicalisation.

“The ‘Tribunal’ and its so-called ‘conclusions’ are mere clumsy shows staged by anti-China elements for their self-entertainment. Anyone with conscience and reason will not be deceived or fooled,” the embassy said. 



About 30 witnesses and experts gave evidence to a series of public hearings in central London earlier this year, alleging torture, forced abortions, rape and beatings by authorities while in state detention centers. The hearings also reviewed large amounts of documents detailing other policies including the separation of young children from their families and widespread destruction of mosques.

The tribunal concluded that it was beyond doubt that crimes against humanity were committed. Nice said Xi and other senior officials “bear primary responsibility” for what has occurred in Xinjiang.

“This vast apparatus of state repression could not exist if a plan was not authorized at the highest levels,” he said. 

An estimated one million people or more – most of them Uyghurs – have been confined in reeducation camps in Xinjiang in recent years, according to researchers. 

The hearings were the latest attempt to hold China accountable for its policies targeting the Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim and ethnic Turkic minorities.

UK Uyghur Tribunal Geoffrey Nice

Tribunal chair Geoffrey Nice delivers the verdict of the independent tribunal assessing evidence on China’s alleged rights abuses against the Uyghur people, in London, on Thursday, 9th December. PICTURE: AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali.

A key part of the evidence was drawn from leaked Chinese government documents that Adrian Zenz, an academic specializing in the topic, said showed a direct link from Xi to the sweeping detention of more than a million people belonging to minorities, forced labor programs and forced birth control practices on Uyghur and other minority women.

Zenz wrote in a report that the leaked documents showed that the links “between statements and mandates made by Xi and other central government figures and policies that were implemented after 2016 are far more extensive, detailed and significant than previously understood”.

In Turkey, Semsinur Gafur, who submitted a video testimony to the London hearings, said she was pleased that the hearings shone a light on what is happening in Xinjiang.

“They’re trying to erase us from the face of the earth and get rid of us completely,” she told The AP. “The tribunal has shown us the world will do something, that humanity is not dead.”


We rely on our readers to fund Sight's work - become a financial supporter today!

For more information, head to our Subscriber's page.


The US Government has declared that Beijing’s policies against the Uyghurs amounted to genocide and crimes against humanity. Legislatures in Britain, Belgium, the Netherlands and Canada have done the same. 

British lawmakers urged the government to impose sanctions targeting responsible individuals and businesses as well as examine the country’s supply chain to make sure it is not complicit.

“It’s really imperative to call upon our government to act now,” said Helena Kennedy, a member of Britain’s House of Lords. “The evidence is absolutely clear for anyone to see.”

Jo Smith Finley, a Chinese studies expert at Newcastle University, said that while Thursday’s findings were not a legal ruling and had “no legal teeth,” they would still put significant pressure on governments to act.

“There is still time to prevent, still time for governments and civil societies to step up,” she said.

Mervyn Thomas, former president of Christian UK-based religious freedom advocacy CSW, said in a statement the organisation “hopes that this important judgement will bring further and urgent international attention to the ongoing human rights crisis in the Uyghur region”.

“While this determination is of clear importance, as the judgement notes, the Tribunal has no power to sanction the PRC, and therefore ‘assumes politicians, civil society, NGOs and powerful individuals who may have some powers of sanction and who can make their voices heard…will do so’,” he said. “CSW calls again for further action from the United Nations, and democratic governments, to hold to account those responsible for these violations. The world must not stand by and allow these grave crimes to go unanswered.”

– With AP correspondents HUIZONG WU in Taipei, Taiwan, and AYSE WIETING in Istanbul, Turkey, and DAVID ADAMS/Sight.

Correction: Newcastle University expert Jo Smith Finley’s name has been corrected.

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.