SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

Britons say they oppose police use of facial recognition tech

London, UK
Thomson Reuters Foundation

Almost two in three Britons disagree with police using artificial intelligence such as facial recognition technology to identify suspects, according to a survey released on Friday.

Public bodies and employers could face a popular backlash against “tech creep” in sectors from recruitment to policing, found the poll, commissioned by Britain’s Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce.

Facial recognition technology

Airport workers demonstrate the use of new facial recognition gates at the North Terminal of Gatwick Airport near London, on 23rd November, 2009. The gates can be used by any British or EEA national who holds a biometric passport and are designed to speed travellers through immigration control. PICTURE: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

“An increasing amount of decision making – in our public services, the job market and healthcare – is taking place via ever more opaque processes,” said Asheem Singh, the RSA’s acting head of tech and society.

“We need an open conversation about AI and other forms of decision making, driven by the principles of transparency and accountability.”

There has been growing debate over the use of facial recognition technology by some police forces, with supporters saying it allows smarter policing, while critics say it is intrusive and often inaccurate.

The technology uses surveillance cameras equipped with facial-recognition software to scan passers-by in public spaces and uses artificial intelligence to compare them to watch lists of people being sought by police.

If a suspect is identified, they can be stopped on the spot.

Pollsters YouGov surveyed more than 2,000 British adults for the RSA, which gathered a “citizen jury” of about 25 people to debate computer decision-making.

The panellists looked at its use by police for automated facial recognition and to help decide when to prosecute people who have been arrested.

They concluded it was possible that machines would be more objective than people, but raised concerns that technology could reflect human biases and said there should be human oversight and accountability over decisions.

The RSA called for greater public engagement by tech firms to educate the public about how technology is being developed and to help shape how artificial intelligence is used.

California in September banned police from using body cameras with facial recognition software, while some privacy campaigners have developed make-up or clothing designed to prevent the technology from identifying them.

 

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.