SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

Ten years after war ended, Sri Lankan Tamils may never get back land

Bangkok, Thailand
Thomson Reuters Foundation

Sri Lankan Government forces may never return swathes of land taken from ethnic Tamils during a decades-long civil war, land and human rights experts said on Friday, further impoverishing tens of thousands uprooted in the bloody conflict.

Thousands of people were killed in the war, which ended in May, 2009, after nearly three decades, and many of those who fled or were forced from their homes in the north and east had their properties seized, according to human rights groups.

Sri Lanka Tamils

A man walks past a mural depicting fighting during the war in Colombo, on 27th April, 2011. PICTURE: REUTERS/Andrew Caballero-Reynolds

Government authorities said about 80 per cent of confiscated land had been handed back. The remainder, mostly held by the military, may never be returned, said Dhammika Herath, a post-conflict expert at the University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka.

“It is unrealistic to expect that these lands would ever be released because the government would continue to maintain permanent military bases,” he said.

“A more pragmatic approach would be the payment of replacement costs to the owners at current market prices. People are dependent on agriculture, and the lack of access to land has translated into lack of employment and poverty.”

Land access, use and ownership are central concerns for post-conflict peacebuilding, especially in agriculture-dependent areas, according to the United Nations’ refugee agency, UNHCR.

With people returning after long absences – as in Sri Lanka – there can be difficulties with proving ownership, military control, occupation by others, and re-zoning, said Menique Amarasinghe, head of UNHCR’s Sri Lanka office.

“Access to land remains a problem for many,” she said.

“If the military cannot release all of the land, then there is a need to clearly identify which lands will not be released, and provide just compensation.”

Sri Lanka President Maithripala Sirisena had vowed to return all land held in the northern and eastern provinces by 31st December, 2018 but that deadline was not met, according to human rights groups.

Nearly 12,140 hectares of private land were still being held as of 31st March, according to government officials.

Sumith Atapattu, a spokesman for the Sri Lankan army, said the land is being retained for “security purposes”.

“We are open to seeing if compensation or some alternate arrangement can be made,” he said.

New security fears after bombings last month, which killed more than 250 people and triggered violent clashes, may further delay the process, said Ravindra De Silva of youth rights group, the Association for Friendship and Love.

“This is not a priority now. The army can say they need to hold on to the high security zones for some more time,” he said.

“People lost their homes, their livelihoods, and have not received compensation or reparations. This will prolong their suffering,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Some have taken matters into their own hands.

Earlier this year, more than 100 Sri Lankan Tamil families in the northeastern town of Mullaitivu said they would occupy their former homes forcefully if their land was not returned, following the lead of others who did so last year.

 

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.