SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

SIGHT-SEEING: WORDS ARE THE INCARNATION OF THOUGHT – ON THE TRINITY

BRIAN NIXON, in an article first published by ASSIST News Service, writes how the realisation that words are the “incarnation of thought” helped him to better understand the Trinity…

Triangles

ASSIST News Service

I remember when I came to the realisation that words matter. I was sitting in a college English class in Fremont, California. The class was reading and discussing TS Eliot’s poem, Journey of the Magi. And for some reason I had an epiphany while contemplating the 43 line poem. True, the poem is an amazing piece of verse. But it wasn’t necessarily the exclusiveness of the poem that prompted the feeling. Rather, Journey of the Magi acted as a final destination for my own journey with language, a metaphor for the wonder of words.

After reading the Eliot poem that day something clicked; I came to see that words are the incarnation of thought. And because words can represent things seen (car, house, etc.) and unseen (feelings and ideas) they are worthy of due attention. I became an aficionado of words and the written language, wanting to understand how words provide meaning as vehicles for ideas.

Triangles

A BETTER ILLUSTRATION? Professor Norman Geisler says ‘better’ illustrations of the Trinity include a triangle. PICTURE: Thad Zajdowicz/www.freeimages.com

“For Augustine, conventional signs are those things “which living beings mutually exchange for the purpose of showing, as well as they can, the feelings of their minds, or their perceptions, or their thoughts”. Augustine saw conventional signs as having two levels: a literal sense and a figurative sense. One can use an eagle as an example of the two signs: an eagle is a bird (literal meaning) and can be a symbol of freedom (figurative meaning).”

It wasn’t until later that I read St Augustine’s observation on words and how words act as an illustration for ideas, and ultimately, the Trinity. For Augustine, words are “signs” rooted in reality, what he called “things.” Augustine categorised signs into “natural” and “conventional” (see On Christian Doctrine). Natural signs are those things that don’t necessary “lead to a greater knowledge of something else”. A commonly used illustration for “natural” signs is how smoke indicates a fire.

A conventional sign is connected to ideas and meaning. For Augustine, conventional signs are those things “which living beings mutually exchange for the purpose of showing, as well as they can, the feelings of their minds, or their perceptions, or their thoughts”. Augustine saw conventional signs as having two levels: a literal sense and a figurative sense. One can use an eagle as an example of the two signs: an eagle is a bird (literal meaning) and can be a symbol of freedom (figurative meaning).

I won’t go further into Augustine’s ideas on signs. Many philosophers and linguists have unpacked his work. My point is that Augustine connected thought to speech to words.

Rather, I’d like to briefly comment on how words help us understand the Trinity. In my theology proper class at Veritas Evangelical Seminary, Professor Norman Geisler pointed out “poor” and “better” illustrations to use when discussing the Trinity, particularly with people that are having a difficult time apprehending the truth (as Geisler liked to say, “no one can completely comprehend the Trinity, but we can apprehend it”).

Geisler first pointed out the poor illustrations often used by Christians. These include: three states of water (solid, liquid, and gas), three links in a chain, and the human body (body, soul and spirit) (to learn the reasons behind this, read Geisler’s Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, God/Creation, pages 293-295).

Geisler then moved on to the better illustrations. These included: a triangle (three different sides, one object), mathematics (1x1x1=1), love (a lover, a beloved, and the spirit of love), and mind, ideas, and words. Geisler said he got a couple of these comparisons from Augustine, which brings me full circle.

In Augustine’s On the Trinity, the relationship of love’s trifold nature and the mind/word/idea concept is at its clearest. Augustine’s thought went something like this: If, indeed, Jesus is the word then there must be speech (the Spirit) and a speaker (the Father). This word-speech-speaker analogy correlates easily, then, to the word (Jesus), ideas (Spirit), and mind (Father) illustration.

It may take a few moments to let this sink in. But Augustine’s point is that the mind/ideas/words concept is a unique way to think about the interrelationship within the Godhead: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, co-equal and consubstantial. And though all analogies fall short, some illustrations help bring clarity for an intellectually stirring truth. I think this is one of the stronger illustrations, particularly as it relates to the Biblical phrase, “And the Word became flesh” (John 1: 14).

So the next time you’re reading a great poem – or any piece of literature for that matter – thank God that a mind produced the thought, and that the idea was communicated through the word. For in this process we find a glimpse of the Godhead.

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.