SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

SIGHT-SEEING: THE MAJORITY PROTEST LIKE CHARLES IVES BUT JESUS DOES IT BETTER

TIME

In an article first published by ASSIST News Service, BRIAN NIXON looks at the concept of the protestor… 

ASSIST News Service

On a recent radio broadcast of (US radio show) Theology Thursday, I was asked how Christians should approach politics. After giving the listener the matrix of prayer, intellect, and social engagement, I had time, later, to chew on the question. Overall, Christians and political engagement reminded me of a TIME Magazine article published in 2011 that designated the person of the year as ‘The Protestor’. TIME stated that the “person” is someone who has had great impact – for good or for ill – on the year.

According to the writer of the article, Jim Frederick, “Because of the success of the protests this year, at least for the time being, governments and people in power are going to have to pay very serious attention to public protesters in a way, that for the past couple of decades, they had been irrelevant or marginalised. I think that the concept of mass, mobilised protester is a very potent political force and will be now for several years at least.”

TIME

PERSON OF THE YEAR? TIME Magazine’s cover from 2011.

“(P)rotest goes hand-in-hand with being a human. Yet underneath the idea of a ‘protest’ lies something deeper, more philosophical and moral. At its heart, protest carries the notion that something is unjust; that the world is out of alignment, that truth is not being heard.”

Protest is nothing new. It goes back to the earliest moments of human history. Even the Bible is full of protest; be it Moses protesting the treatment of the Hebrews or early Christians protesting the treatment of the new faith movement. Paul gave voice to protest when he claimed, “Jesus is Lord”. For in saying this he was clearly stating that Caesar or the Roman Government was not!

The bottom line is that protest goes hand-in-hand with being a human.

Yet underneath the idea of a “protest” lies something deeper, more philosophical and moral. At its heart, protest carries the notion that something is unjust; that the world is out of alignment, that truth is not being heard.

The ‘protest’ movement should not be allocated to just Biblical examples; social protest abounds as well. Here in America we are familiar with protest movements such as the civil rights protests (led by Martin Luther King, Jr, and James Farmer) and Vietnam protests (led by such divergent individuals as Abbie Hoffman and Daniel Berrigan, SJ).

Historically and closely associated to the Occupy protests, or the more recent Black Lives Matter Protests, that are found in cities throughout the world is that of the American composer and writer, Charles Ives (1874-1954).

Ives’ life-and influence-can be divided into three major eras: composer, successful businessman, and essayist.

As composer he created a body of work that was years ahead of its time, using polytonality and polyrhythm as the basis of communicating reality as he saw it. His musical efforts culminated with the Pulitzer Prize in 1947 (interestingly, Ives is reported to have given away his prize money, stating, “prizes are the badges of mediocrity.”)

As a successful businessman, Ives and his business partner, Julian Myrick, helped create concepts such as estate planning and mutual insurance policies.

After a series of health setbacks (heart attack, diabetes, and cataracts), Ives turned his attention to the last of his creative endeavors: writing and publishing.

It is within his writings that we find a similarity with the modern protesters that TIME has honored within its pages and we see throughout the streets of America.

In Ives’ longest essay entitled, The Majority (written in 1920), he sets forth his ideology of the Majority vs. the Minority by asking, “Who are going to run things in the country-in this world, for that matter? A few millionaires, a few anarchists, a few capitalists, a few party-leaders, a few labor-leaders, a few political-leaders, a few ‘hystericals’, a few conservatives, a few agitators, a few cracks, a few this, a few that, or YOU! The Majority – the People?”

So begins Ives’ essay calling for a fair and equitable democracy.

Noted theologian, James McClendon, points out that Ives’ “convictions led to definite political theory about income redistribution and property limitation”.

If you didn’t know that Ives wrote this essay prior to the 1929 market crash (before the last major economic disaster) you’d think that he was sitting on a corner by Wall Street waxing eloquent on the abuses of power in today’s world.

Protest is protest in any generation.

What’s interesting to note is that Ives was a wealthy businessman, and as a businessman, he was protesting that which helped create his wealth – the high dollar world of Wall Street (what he calls, The Minority, in his essay). Recent political debates have honed in on the same topic as Ives.

Yet Ives had more in mind than creating wealth for himself.

Charles Ives

Charles Ives, who called for a “fair and equitable democracy” in the US.

In a memo he wrote to a man named, Darby A Day, Ives intimated that he wished to “revise the business inline with its human function as opposed to its role as a guardian of the assets of the investors” (James McClendon, Biography as Theology).

Putting the larger arguments brought up by Ives or the modern Occupy movement aside, I ask a simple question: should the ‘Protestor’ be named ‘The Person of the Year?’

Taking a literalist point of view, the answer is, no; ‘The Protestor’ is not one person (as the TIME designation seems to suggest), but a collective group of people, ‘The Protestors’.

On the other hand, the honor is fitting and noble, deserving a loud ‘yes’. And Christians need not be ashamed or shocked by the protests. For Jesus Himself teaches us to “Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness (or justice)”. And by seeking God’s justice, we at times will confront this worlds system and government, causing a head-on collision.

So expect confrontation or persecution for doing what is right. Jesus said it would occur. In the purest form, Jesus is the Great Protestor, the One who protested the ways of evil, eventually leading to the cross.

But Jesus’ protest was not for the sake of protesting. There was an end to His protest, an intended goal: the cross led to the grave, which led to the resurrection, which will one day lead to a New Heaven and New Earth.

So though we protest the injustice we see in the world – and agree or disagree with politicians who point one direction or the other, our aim should be towards the promise of God’s established kingdom. It’s His battle; it’s His kingdom. Thereby we should wage a peaceful battle, according to His rules, His purposes, and according to His plan.

Jesus continues to lead the protest movement.

And like the protestors throughout the ages who have a leader shout out words to be repeated by the larger group, we, Jesus’ followers, do well to mimic His voice, His motto, and His life.

This alone will be protest enough.

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.