ED STETZER, a professor and dean at Wheaton College, says – in an article first published on Religion News Service, that the question for Christians is simple – do we want to be known for love that reflects our Saviour or known for a sideshow demanding its rights?…
In April, 1721, Boston endured one of its worst epidemics when a ship arrived in its harbour carrying smallpox. As the disease ravaged Boston, it was one of its leading ministers, Cotton Mather, who, despite fierce opposition culminating in an attempted bombing of his house, became the leading voice of inoculations.
Years later, when a smallpox outbreak hit New England, Jonathan Edwards modelled similar leadership in recognising that the personal risks of a vaccine were far outweighed by the common good. Believing his example would spur on others, Edwards – though not in good health – received the vaccine. The inoculation ultimately took his life – even as it saved many others. He gave his life, in a pandemic, for the good of his neighbours.
PICTURE: CDC/Creative Commons
As historian Douglas Sweeney observes, “before the rise of modern medicine, ministers usually had to take the lead in showing support for doctors [who were often fellow pastors]”.
These stories have been at the forefront of my mind in recent months as I’ve watched the split among churches over how to lead in response to a pandemic that, while less deadly than smallpox, has nevertheless wrought unprecedented damage across the globe. In most cases the division has been a difference in conscience and perspective, but distressingly, an emerging number of voices have begun to express their dissent with threats of violence. Their outcries reflect the language of personal autonomy and security over the historic models of selflessness and sacrifice.
“I’ve watched the split among churches over how to lead in response to a pandemic that, while less deadly than smallpox, has nevertheless wrought unprecedented damage across the globe. In most cases the division has been a difference in conscience and perspective, but distressingly, an emerging number of voices have begun to express their dissent with threats of violence. Their outcries reflect the language of personal autonomy and security over the historic models of selflessness and sacrifice.”
Take for example: “If you show up to impede our First Amendment rights, we’re going to show up at the door with our Second Amendment rights.”
Spoken during the Freedom Matters Tour, these words belong to pastor Greg Locke and received a standing ovation. The founder and lead pastor of Global Vision Bible Church in Mount Juliet, Tennessee, Locke has been one of several religious leaders who have gained a public platform for their vocal opposition to COVID-19 restrictions. As a pastor, Locke bases much of his opposition in religious language and belief, exemplified in a 7th August tweet displaying a sign reading: “This is a MASK FREE Church. Kindly Remove Them or Stay in your car. We Celebrate FAITH over Fear.”
This weekend in Portland, Oregon, worship leader Sean Feucht issued a similar threat. Feucht posted a picture of himself on Twitter, kneeling with his guitar in front of a group of men outfitted in military style vests, and warned, “If you mess with them or our 1 amendment right to worship God – you’ll meet Jesus one way or another.”
In other words, they are willing to take the life of their neighbour.
Feucht links himself to the counterculture revivals of the 1960s-’70s in describing himself as the leader of a new Jesus Movement and has adopted a posture of provocateur against COVID-19 restrictions. His tactics were detailed in a recent RNS column: “[He] is known for being opportunistic when it comes to marrying politics with worship leading. Feucht…[travels] to spots in the United States where horrific deaths at the hands of police have taken place or where long-term protests in support of Black Lives Matter are going on. He sings happy songs about God being on his side, the speakers turned up to full volume in order to literally drown out the protesters’ cries for justice.”
In justifying these tactics, Feucht regularly interweaves Christian and civic language. In the aforementioned tweet, he praised his “security team” as “ex-military, ex-police, private security & mostly importantly LOVERS OF JESUS & freedom.”
But here is the reality: Locke and Feucht are sideshows in the midst of a global pandemic and a time of Christian service and mission. Hungry for media attention and skilled at getting the headlines, both have given many non-Christians another reason to reject Christianity.
When I call them sideshows, I mean only that they distract attention. Just as drivers are compelled to stop and look at a car wreck along the road, we can’t help but watch their antics. But to faithful Christians discouraged by their platforms and to onlooking media, let me again say: This is only a distraction.
Around the country, thousands of faithful churches are doing the real work of ministry serving their communities, discipling their people and proclaiming the Gospel of Christ. Faced with the challenge of COVID-19, these churches have persevered all while this faithfulness remains often unnoticed.
Since both Locke and Feucht are quick to cite their First Amendment rights, I’m going to use mine now to point out this distraction, to call Christians to a better way and implore the media to resist making them representative of the Christian faith. They are not.
“The most concerning aspect of these sideshows has been the adoption of their ‘faith over fear’ line among many Christians. The insinuation is that wearing masks, getting vaccinations and taking other precautions against the disease represents a spiritual deficiency, whereas true believers have confidence to trust God and so need not do any of that.”
The most concerning aspect of these sideshows has been the adoption of their “faith over fear” line among many Christians. The insinuation is that wearing masks, getting vaccinations and taking other precautions against the disease represents a spiritual deficiency, whereas true believers have confidence to trust God and so need not do any of that.
In this asinine interpretation of divine providence, it is hard not to think that faith has been reduced to a cosmic coin flip. Why draw the line with masks, just burn through stoplights and eat food off the bathroom floor. After all, faith over fear, right?
Yes, faith calls us to trust in the security of God. At this moment, many Christians around the globe encounter real persecution for the sake of the Gospel. Moreover, there are times when Christians should oppose the government when there are legitimate threats to religious freedom. Pastor Mark Dever modelled this well last fall in opposing lockdown restrictions, earning his church not only a precedent-setting legal victory but the respect of other leaders.
In my office, one of my favourite possessions is a first-edition biography of David Brainerd, written by Jonathan Edwards. It tells the story of one of the best-known missionaries in North America. As a pastor who has commissioned many similar missionaries and is personally dedicated to reaching people in North America for Christ, I can tell you: The antics of Locke and Feucht are not helping – but the faithful work of countless churches and Christians who are sharing the love of Jesus in a pandemic is making a difference.
The question for pastors, church leaders and the entire Christian church is simple: Do we want to be known for love that reflects our Saviour or known for a sideshow demanding its rights?
You can’t scream at the world and reach the world at the same time. Showing Christ’s love for the good of our neighbours, even when it’s uncomfortable and sacrificial – that’s what it means to have faith over fear.
Ed Stetzer is a professor and dean at Wheaton College.
