SUBSCRIBE NOW

SIGHT

Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

Essay: Overturning Roe v Wade inches us back toward the arc of justice

US US Supreme Court Sept 21

In the wake of this week’s unprecedented US Supreme Court leak, KAREN SWALLOW PRIOR – in an article first published on Religion News Service, says overturning Roe v Wade will put abortion laws back at the state level, which only means that pro-life work is far from over…

United States
Via RNS

Everywhere I look today – social media, news outlets, my email – people are discussing the SCOTUS leak. As a pro-life activist my whole adult life, I never thought I’d live to see the end of Roe v Wade, if that’s what this is.

Yet for me and others who recognise children in the womb as human persons whose lives are deserving of legal protection, overturning Roe doesn’t go far enough.

US US Supreme Court Sept 21

This 3rd September, 2021, photo shows the Supreme Court in Washington. PICTURE: AP Photo/J Scott Applewhite.

The end of Roe will not bring back the millions of lives lost, heal the women and men and families harmed, or repair the damage done to our nation and our political life.

But it is a step in the right direction.

“The end of Roe will not bring back the millions of lives lost, heal the women and men and families harmed, or repair the damage done to our nation and our political life. But it is a step in the right direction.”

I really didn’t expect to see Roe overturned in my lifetime, but I always hoped. I know we can do better than abortion for women and children – and if Roe is overturned, we will have more than ever both the opportunity and the obligation to do so.

Roe v Wade forced abortion on the nation by inventing a “right” to abortion on demand that was novel, unprecedented and unfounded on any common understanding of human life and human dignity. The most bizarre mental and linguistic gymnastics developed around this newly constructed constitutional right in order to justify, rationalise and shield ourselves from the obvious fact that abortion unjustly ends the life of a human being.

Coming seemingly out of nowhere, Roe catapulted America into a kind of civil war that turned all politics into national politics. Uniting people of vastly different goals, beliefs and political views around the topic of abortion (on either side) drew new political lines, brought new levels of pragmatism to political ethics and gave new urgency to a culture war that seems unlikely to end anytime soon. (Even the unprecedented leaking of the court draft is likely owed to this heightened polarization and toxic division.) The issue of abortion – which is for many, me included, rooted in heartfelt and sincerely held views – has become weaponised, a tool too often used by politicians and grifters to exploit and monetise.



Overturning Roe v Wade will put abortion laws back at the state level, which only means that pro-life work is far from over. Some states will pursue liberal laws. Some, as we have been seeing recently, will have more restrictive laws.

Yet the definition of human lives is not a matter for the people or the state to decide. The right to life is endowed on all by our creator and the highest purpose of human law is to protect human life.


We rely on our readers to fund Sight's work - become a financial supporter today!

For more information, head to our Subscriber's page.


Court decisions that parse who is and isn’t human have never aged well. In the 1857 Dred Scott v Sandford decision, the court ruled that enslaved people were not citizens of the United States and were therefore not entitled to protections from the federal government or the courts. The ruling, considered one of the worst in the history of the court, has been described as the court’s great “self-inflicted wound.” Roe will surely be understood in the pages of history similarly.

Human history, even American history, has a long record of some people considering other people their property. Even so, I hold the hope that Martin Luther King, Jr, once did that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice”.

Justice demands the lives of human beings in the womb be protected by human law and in human hearts.

Karen Swallow Prior is research professor of English and Christianity and culture at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and the author of several books, including On Reading Well: Finding the Good Life through Great Books. Her writing has appeared at Christianity Today, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, First Things and Vox, among others. 

This article contains an affliate link.

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.