| 27th
February, 2007
STEFAN
J. BOS
Bosnewslife.com
In one of
the most momentous cases in its 60-year history, the International
Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague has cleared Serbia of
responsibility for genocide during the three-year war in Bosnia-Herzegovina,
but ruled that it failed to prevent it.
The ruling by the ICJ, the United Nations’ highest court,
came as a major setback for Bosnia-Herzegovina which sought
billions of dollars in compensation from Serbia for acts of
genocide, including a massacre of Muslims in the Bosnian town
of Srebrenica in 1995.
The
president of the International Court of Justice, Judge
Rosalyn Higgins, acknowledged that Bosnian Serb forces
were responsible for what became known as Europe’s
worst single atrocity since World War II.
|
Reading from a lengthy
judgment statement, the president of the International Court
of Justice, Judge Rosalyn Higgins, acknowledged that Bosnian
Serb forces were responsible for what became known as Europe’s
worst single atrocity since World War II.
Up to eight-thousand Muslim men and boys were massacred in
and around Srebrenica in July 1995 when Bosnian Serb forces
overran the town after outgunned Dutch UN peacekeepers abandoned
it.
While she described the killings as "genocide",
Judge Higgins said there was no evidence that Serbia was directly
involved in it. "It has not been established that those
massacres were committed on the instructions or under the
direction of organs of the respondent’s state, nor that
the respondent exercised effective control over the operations,"
she declared.
Belgrade had argued that it could not be blamed for actions
by individual ethnic groups during "a civil war."
Serbia ’s government also warned that a negative ruling
would be an “unjust and lasting stigma on the state,"
which overthrew its wartime leader Slobodan Milosevic in 2000.
Milosevic died last year, just months before a verdict in
his trial on 66 counts of genocide and war crimes was due.
Although Higgins seemed to agree with Belgrade that Serbia
was not directly to blame, she said the Balkan state “violated
its obligation under the (UN) Genocide Convention to prevent
genocide in Srebrenica,” by not using its influence
in the region during the 1992-1995 Bosnian War.
In addition, the court found that Serbia violated the Convention
by "failing to co-operate with the International Tribunal
for the former Yugoslavia." UN prosecutors have accused
Serbia of not doing enough to hand-over key war crimes suspects,
including Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladic and former Bosnian
Serb President Radovan Karadzic. Both men have been accused
of involvement in the Srebrenica massacre.
It was the first time a state had been tried for genocide,
outlawed in the Genocide Convention in 1948, after the Nazi
Holocaust of about six million Jews.
The binding ruling, was not expected to ease tensions in the
region, analysts said. Hungarian and other peacekeepers were
likely have work for years to come, suggested Sarajevo-based
political analyst Jakob Finci. He warned that UN court case
was going to cause more divisions and problems within Bosnia
Herzegovina.
"I'm
afraid it will not have a really positive consequence,
not only because of dissatisfaction of one side but
also because of the internal tensions in Bosnia and
Herzegovina," said political analyst Jakob Finci
of the decision.
|
"I'm afraid
it will not have a really positive consequence, not only because
of dissatisfaction of one side but also because of the internal
tensions in Bosnia and Herzegovina ," Finci added.
Samaritan’s Purse, a Christian aid group led by American
Evangelist Billy Graham’s son, Franklin, has been among
organizations reaching out to survivors of the massacre, often
working in difficult circumstances.
It has expressed concerns about the "lack of hope"
and hatred in the region. The group partnered with local churches
to provide food packages to families, including Muslims, unable
to afford to buy anything after the 1992-1995 armed conflict
ended.
The ruling meant that Bosnia-Herzegovina would not be able
to receive billions of dollars for reparations, money it desperately
needs to rebuild its fractured nation.
The court decision was also devastating news for people like
34-year old Hedija Krdzic, who lost her husband, father and
grandfather at Srebrenica.
"A ruling that Serbia committed genocide in Bosnia [would
have meant] everything to me. Without such a ruling I fear
that one day the massacre will be forgotten," she told
reporters. However the many crosses littering the Bosnian
landscape are still visible reminders of the war and its atrocities,
in which in total at least 100,000 people were killed.
The conflict began after Bosnia ’s Muslims and Croats
followed Slovenia and Croatia in breaking away from Serb dominated
Yugoslavia in April 1992. However the Bosnian Serbs wanted
to remain in Yugoslavia .
Backed by the Yugoslav army, Serb forces captured two-thirds
of Bosnia and besieged Sarajevo . The city was often pounded
by Serb artillery from positions in the mountains surrounding
the city. Snipers were also active, often forcing people to
run for cover.
Tens of thousands of non-Serbs were killed and hundreds of
thousands forced from their homes. Under a 1995 peace accord
Bosnia Herzegovina eventually it split into a Muslim-Croat
federation and a Bosnian Serb state.
While the historic UN genocide case did little to heal the
wounds of history, the prime minister of the Bosnian Serbian
state, known as Srpska Republic, said following the ruling
he would urge Bosnian Serb institutions to apologize to families
of the victims by Bosnian Serb troops during the war.
However, in almost the same breath, Prime Minister Milorad
Dodik made clear that this apology would not be unconditional.
“Everyone in Bosnia should stop with aspirations
about the guilt (in the past), and should focus on
how to go further on,” Bosnian Serbian Prime
Minister Milorad Dodik said.
|
Someone, he said,
should also make “the same apology to Bosnian Serbs"
killed during the war in Bosnia , referring to other two Bosnia
's ethnic peoples - Muslims and Croats. Dodik rejected any
responsibility of the Srpska Republic , its institutions and
its people for the Srebrenica massacre, which he refused to
acknowledge as ‘genocide.’ He claimed the crime
was committed by individuals who must be punished.
“Everyone in Bosnia should stop with aspirations about
the guilt (in the past), and should focus on how to go further
on,” Dodik told media in Banja Luka, the regional capital.
That seemed wishful
thinking, with mass graves still being discovered and crosses
littering the Bosnian landscape.
Agree?
Disagree? Want to give your opinion? Have your say here...
|