| 18th
May, 2005
JIM REIHER
What an uproar Deakin University academic Professor
Mirko Bagaric caused this week when it was revealed that he
argued in an article to be published in a US law journal next
month that it was morally acceptable to use torture for the
greater good.
So - is it ever OK to use torture? What about the scenarios
that Professor Bagaric suggested? What if we might just be
able to stop a September 11 from happening if we torture a
suspect (even to death)?
 |
TORTURE
CENTRE: An image from Toul Sleng, a former high school
that was taken over by the Khmer Rouge as a interrogation
and torture centre to purge Cambodia of perceived
dissidents. Now a museum. PICTURE: Simon Gurney
"Making
it acceptable for modern governments to use torture
for the greater good opens up a hornet’s nest
of issues. Any move to do so will result in a slow
process of compromise as the term 'greater good' is
stretched and changed over time."
-
Jim Reiher
|
The
short answer has to be no. It is never acceptable to use torture.
If it is suddenly morally acceptable to use torture, then
it is acceptable to do anything cruel and evil - so long as
we can persuade ourselves that ‘greater good’
will come out of it.
Using evil to bring about good is something that non-Christians
might be divided over, but it is not something that should
confuse a Christian. Paul made it emphatically clear that
“the weapons of our warfare are not carnal” (II
Corinthians 10:4). James pleaded in his epistle that Christians
must not be “friends of the world” because in
doing so - in using the methods and wisdom of the world to
fight injustice - we become “enemies of God” (James
4:4; see all of 3:13-4:4).
We cannot accept that the ends justify the means. And that
is the issue after all. The ends do not justify the means.
They never do. Why not? Because every means is an end. Every
means might not lead to the end they are suppose to lead to.
Every means is vulnerable and tenuous. It will have unpredictable
outcomes. And none of us is all-seeing and all-powerful.
Making it acceptable for modern governments to use torture
for the greater good opens up a hornet’s nest of issues.
Any move to do so will result in a slow process of compromise
as the term “greater good” is stretched and changed
over time.
It might be arguable that it would be for the greater good
to torture a suspected terrorist and possibly prevent another
September 11. If that is so, then it is probably acceptable
to torture a suspected murdered who might kill again. Or a
suspected child molestor who might offend again. Or a suspected
house robber who occasionally attacks old people and steals
from them. Or a suspected petrol station robber who scares
people with knives and needles. Or a suspected mugger who
robs people in the street at night. And if extreme, horrible
Christians win power and believe in the right to use torture,
then maybe it is OK to use torture on people who might hurt
others spiritually. Perhaps we can torture people of other
faiths, and help save their souls from eternal damnation.
And maybe we can even torture less passionate Christians -
the liberals and compromisers who don’t hold true doctrine
or practice. It might be the way to save their souls too.
And what do you know? We have become the medieval Catholic
Church again, carnal and worldly to the core. Powerful, cruel,
torturers of heretics, burners of books, inspirers of crusades,
and completely opposite to the Christ they claimed to follow.
No - Christians should have learnt the lesson of history.
It is never acceptable to copy the ways of the world to advance
the Kingdom of God. It doesn’t work. If there are apparent
results, they are incidental to the truth of the Kingdom.
They are illusions unrelated to the real work of the Kingdom.
Torture undermines another Biblical truth: that all people
are made in the image of God. It is sin to torture another
human being. It is evil against not just the person, but against
God Himself.
Some might like to say that there is, even in Scripture, a
place for governments to rule with strength. There is a place
for governments to make hard decisions and sometimes they
have to do somethings that individual Christians are not meant
to ever do themselves. Take as an example the fact that governments
have police forces that keep law and order. Sometimes the
police have to use violence to restrain violent people. Sometimes
they have to shoot evil people who are harming others. If
that is acceptable, then why isn’t torture acceptable
too?
The answer to that is that just because we allow governments
to do some things individual Christians should in theory not
do, it does not mean governments can or should be allowed
to do all things evil. To open the door to legal torture would
be the first step to turning our democratic and free countries
into extreme right-wing Nazi-like regimes.
Only the very worst governments use and justify torture. And
they will say it is like police using guns to prevent bad
things from happening. It is a tool of the state. But we know
from history that such tools of state are never kept for just
“the greater good.” They get used for all sorts
of totally unacceptable reasons as well. Personal enemies
of the state can be silenced. Vendettas can take place. Evil
does reign. The onus is on Professor Bagaric to show even
one case in all of history, where a government used torture
only for the greater good! How quickly any noble theories
have deteriorated into regimes of fear and oppression. Stalin,
Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, and dozens
of others remind us that evil people use torture. It is not
a tool that can be tamed “for good".
Is it ever acceptable to use torture? No. God help us if we
drift down that tragic pathway.
Jim Reiher (BA (double major in
history), BA in Theology, Dip Ed. MA in Theology (Hons)) is
a full time lecturer for Tabor College Victoria, lecturing
in church history and New Testament; and also has speciality
interest areas in women’s ministry, creative ministry,
and the New Age movement. His
views are not necessarily those of other Tabor faculty members
or of Tabor College.
Got an issue you're struggling with? Simply send an
email to editor@sightmagazine.com.au.
|