| 9th
January, 2007
DAVID
ADAMS
Casino Royale (M)
In A Word:
Reinvention
 |
NO
CHANGE HERE; Yes, it's Bond in a casino but it's a
different Bond to the one we're used to.
"A new take on one of the film industry’s
staples, Casino Royale works in putting a
fresh face on what we thought we knew so well."
|
It’s a reinvented
blonde Bond for the harder-hitting Noughties. Casino Royale,
the 21st Bond film, brings a tougher, gritter and more openly
flawed Bond to the screen. Yes, he’s still Bond - he
does always win the day - but the trademark humour of previous
Bond films is gone (sure, he was still a philandering killer
but he did it with a few jokes thrown in).
The film is apparently based reasonably closely on Ian Fleming’s
book but It’s certainly a far cry from the original
movie, a bizarre and camp comedy along the line of an Austin
Powers flick, starring David Niven and Peter Sellers. The
new version, in contrast, shows a Bond who has to subvert
himself - his conscience and his desire for a quiet life -
to perform the grisly tasks the British Government and M (who
is again played by Dame Judi Dench) require of him.
There is a coldness and a toughness about this new Bond and
Daniel Craig fills the role ably, revealing some of the internal
struggle the character goes through as he is transformed into
the famous spy. Yet underneath his hard exterior, the movie
also reveals a previously unknown softer side of Bond - in
one scene he comforts his co-star Vesper Lynd (played by Eva
Green) with a tenderness not usually seen in Bond films.
Craig proves a good choice for the role as does his blonde
hair: both help to emphasise that this is not the Bond we
are used to seeing.
In the same vein as Batman Begins, Casino Royale
briefly takes us back to the start of the Bond story in a
black and white prologue that shows how Bond achieved his
00 status. But the prologue doesn’t go for long and
does leave many questions about Bond unanswered - maybe there’s
more to come on that subject.
Still, while the differences are stark, much remains similar
about this Bond. Yes, he’s once again confronted with
some nasty bad guys, this time led by “banker to the
world’s terrorists”, a blood-weeping asthmatic
called Le Chiffre (played by Mads Mikkelson) whom, in what
is the film’s centrepiece, Bond must defeat in a high
stakes game of poker to stop him financing more death and
destruction.
The gadgets are also still there, although there are fewer
and there is no Q nor any trademark scene in which he shows
Bond the new gear. In what has become a Bond tradition, the
film also contains some far-fetched action scenes - watch
out for the early chase scene involving a free movement style
known apparently as Parkour. There are also the usual stunning
locations and, of course, everyone is living the high life
(there are no terrorists living in Afghan caves in Bond’s
world).
It’s a long film - just as you feel it’s winding
down to a typical Bond ending, a second act kicks off - and
the ending leaves the door open for a sequel (which is unusual
in itself, Bond films of the past have typically been a self-contained
product which little reference to previous works).
A new take on one of the film industry’s staples, Casino
Royale works in putting a fresh face on what we thought
we knew so well. There's generally nothing particularly redeeming
or morally uplifting about Bond films, but they do provide
a couple of hours of diverting entertainment. In that respect,
this latest film is no different.
|