|
3rd
May, 2007
ROD
BENSON
Events in
the Republic of Turkey have attracted recent media attention.
Three events raise important questions for Turkey’s
political future, for the small minority of Christians who
live and work there, and for every community threatened by
radical Islam.
First, Turkey is
in the midst of presidential elections. The nation has been
a secular democratic republic since its establishment in 1923
under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk following
the fall of the Ottoman empire. In recent years Turkey has
sought increasing political integration with Western Europe
while remaining socially and culturally Islamic. According
to government statistics, over 99 per cent of the 70 million
people living in Turkey today identify as Muslim, and less
than one per cent as Christian. Officially Turkey is a secular
state, but Islam retains strong popular support, and that
support may be taking a radical turn.
In the first round of presidential elections on Friday, Foreign
Minister Abdullah Gul, a “former Islamist” from
the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), narrowly missed
being elected to the top job. The AKP dominates the 550-seat
parliament but lacks the required two-thirds majority it needs
to elect Gul. The opposition boycotted the parliamentary vote
on the basis of Gul’s Islamist past.
The Islamist AKP won elections in 2002, but a previous Islamist
government was removed by the military in 1997. Following
Friday’s vote, the army - always a force to be
reckoned with in Turkish politics - issued a statement saying
it was determined to protect Turkey’s secular political
culture and would “take action” if the need arose.
The prospect of Mr Gul becoming head of state has alarmed
Turkish secularists who fear the erosion of the strict separation
of state and religion, and the creeping of radical Islam into
all fields of Turkish life.
Second, The
Australian
reports that, in response to the political uncertainty,
more than a million Turks took part in a mass rally in Istanbul
on Sunday in support of secularism and democracy. The demonstration
followed a similar march in the capital, Ankara, on 14th April
that attracted up to 1.5 million people. This is a sign of
a healthy political culture in Turkey. The aim was not to
banish religious views from political discourse but to uphold
the formal separation of state and religion introduced by
Atatürk in the 1920s.
"It is testament to the current strength of democracy
and freedom in Turkey that, despite being an overwhelmingly
Muslim country, anti-Islamist demonstrations of such
huge size can be held at short notice - and remain
peaceful."
|
It is almost unthinkable
that any politically-motivated crisis would draw such numbers
in Australia. What this suggests about the current health
of Australia’s political culture is discomforting. It
is testament to the current strength of democracy and freedom
in Turkey that, despite being an overwhelmingly Muslim country,
anti-Islamist demonstrations of such huge size can be held
at short notice - and remain peaceful.
One wonders, though, whether the apparent popular support
for Western ideals will be sufficient to maintain Turkey’s
traditional secularism without military intervention. So far
there have been three military coups in Turkey. One also wonders
how long Turkey’s intellectual leadership will retain
its independence in the face of growing pressure from international
Islamic interests. Mr Gul remains a devout Muslim, and at
the same time a strong advocate of Turkish membership in the
decidedly non-religious European Union. Perhaps he and his
backers have continental ambitions.
The third Turkey-related event would probably have passed
unnoticed unless a friend had sent me an email the other day,
drawing attention to the alleged horrific, religiously-based
torture and murder of three Christians in Malatya, Turkey,
on 18th April. The report possessed some of the characteristics
of an internet hoax, but its essence appears genuine. The
news of the killings was carried (albeit far more briefly)
by the BBC, The Australian, and other media agencies.
Ironically, Malatya is the hometown of Mehmet Ali Agca, who
attempted to assassinate Pope John Paul II in May 1981.
The taking of innocent life can never be justified or condoned.
But we know the tragic reality of our world. These three murders
- premeditated, sadistic and barbaric though they were - pale
into statistical and moral insignificance in the face of the
mounting death toll from war in Iraq (more than 3,300 combatants
and at least tens of thousands of civilians, according to
Reuters news agency), the estimated 200,000 dead in Darfur,
or the 30,000 children who die every day as a result of extreme
poverty.
Yet the tragedy in Malatya highlights the dangerous and unpredictable
environment in which many Christian missionaries work today.
And the gracious response of the bereaved families serves
as a reminder of the radical difference, in practice, between
a faith based on love and a religion based on law.
True, there are fundamentalists on both sides of the divide,
and there is the historical embarrassment of the Crusades
and other low points of Christian history. But I cannot imagine
that a genuine, sane follower of Jesus would ever be driven
to killing strangers in cold blood on the basis of religious
convictions.
"The tragedy in Malatya highlights the dangerous
and unpredictable environment in which many Christian
missionaries work today. And the gracious response
of the bereaved families serves as a reminder of the
radical difference, in practice, between a faith based
on love and a religion based on law."
|
At its heart Islam
is ambivalent about the advocacy of violence toward “infidels.”
And there is the disputed matter of the Muslim doctrine of
abrogation, whereby early pacifist passages in the Koran,
written while Mohammed lived in Mecca, are nullified or reinterpreted
by later passages advocating violence, written during his
residency in Medina. Scholars and others selectively apply
abrogation to suit their audience and politics.
When Islamists gain political power in the West, and incrementalism
and abrogation are no longer necessary, it will be too late:
everyone loses - especially Christians and women, but also
capitalism, democracy, justice and peace.
What then can we do? Review our own spiritual convictions
and confessions. Develop a more informed interest in the wider
world, especially geography and politics (for example, try
this
or this). Take
a more activist role in our own political institutions. Talk
to Muslims in our workplace and community. Be alert to the
danger of creeping Islamism. And pray for the people of Turkey.
Reviewing the fate of the church in Turkey in 2004 for Christianity
Today, Collin Hansen concluded:
"The state of the contemporary church in Turkey, home
to so many seminal moments in Christian history, looks bleak
for now. Perhaps integration into the European Union will
galvanize the small Greek Orthodox community in Istanbul and
allow the Turkish government to honestly examine the grizzly
fate of the Armenians. Hopefully the spread of religious freedom
there will ease hostility toward missionaries and converts
from Islam to Christianity. Regardless, we should heed the
warnings of history - beware the dangers of political infighting
between Christians with earthly interests at heart, and never
underestimate the seriousness of Islamic jihad."
Time will tell what political and religious changes sweep
through Turkey. Recent events are alarming and the immediate
future does look potentially bleak. Still, on the whole, Turkey
has for many years managed to forge a workable partnership
between Western-style democracy and Islamic culture, and the
rest of the world can learn much from that achievement.
Rev Rod Benson is founding Director of the Centre for Christian
Ethics at Morling College, Sydney, Australia. This article
was first published in Soundings, a publication of the Centre
for Christian Ethics.
|