|
10th
March, 2007
RUSSELL
STUBBINGS
One would have to live in a monastery tucked away
in some remote corner of a long forgotten country to have
not heard about the James Cameron documentary detailing the
astounding “discovery” of the Jesus family tomb.
And yet, even then, the multi-million dollar Hollywood publicity
machine would find a way to get the message out.
 |
THE
TOMB IN QUESTION: A 1980 photgraph of the Talpiot
tomb. PICTURE: Amos Kloner
"Not
so long ago The Da Vinci Code delivered a
blatant attack on the Christian faith, directed specifically
at, you guessed it, the life, death, and resurrection
of Jesus Christ. We now have 'The Jesus
Family Tomb' conspiracy. Yet another onslaught
against the essence of the Christian faith, the resurrection
of Jesus Christ."
|
I
use the word documentary lightly, since what is presented
as fact is largely based on conjecture and supposition, hardly
deserving to be recognised as factual reporting. Similarly,
the use of the term discovery is somewhat superfluous since
the tomb was actually discovered in 1980, some 27 years previously,
and discounted at the time as the tomb of Jesus Christ by
most archaeologists and Biblical theology experts.
How then can Cameron
claim this is the family tomb of Jesus with any sense of credibility?
Indeed, he is only able to make such a claim because people
are ill-informed and tend to believe anything Hollywood thrusts
down their throats, as they gaze numbly into the major source
of theology in their lives, the television.
Much has been written
regarding the content of the tomb, the claims of the documentary,
and the critical arguments against this being the tomb of
Jesus Christ. With that in mind, the focus here will be around
a nagging, persistent question I have. Why is it that the
resurrection seems to be the target of so many blatant, inaccurate
attempts to bring doubt and undermine the Christian faith?
Not so long ago The Da Vinci Code delivered a blatant
attack on the Christian faith, directed specifically at, you
guessed it, the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
While Dan Brown asserted his novel was fictitious, he also
noted that it contained some factual information. The novel
was also written in a style that made it convincing and almost
believable. In the end though, the claims of the book were
shown to be outlandish and devoid of factual basis, despite
the almost expert tone of Brown’s writing. Was it a
deliberate attack to undermine the foundations of the Christian
faith, or just a clever conspiracy designed to sell books
and make the author a tidy sum of money?
Similarly, we now have 'The Jesus Family Tomb' conspiracy.
Yet another onslaught against the essence of the Christian
faith, the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The very reason these
attacks target the resurrection is because, as the apostle
Paul identifies in 1 Corinthians 15, the bodily resurrection
of Jesus Christ is the hinge on which the Christian faith
swings. Without the resurrection our faith is impotent, and
we are, in Paul’s words, to be pitied among men. James
Cameron asserts that the tomb discovery doesn’t eliminate
the resurrection as such, it only destroys the notion of a
bodily resurrection, allowing for a spiritual resurrection.
This sounds plausible until one realises that the Bible clearly
teaches a bodily resurrection, Jesus rose in bodily form as
the first fruits of the resurrection all believers can eagerly
anticipate. So, if the Bible’s teaching on the bodily
resurrection can be undermined, how can the Bible be trusted
on anything? Quite simply, if the bodily resurrection can
be disproved then it will be difficult to categorically accept
anything the Bible teaches or reveals. What might be next?
The second coming is only a myth, heaven is not real? The
list goes on. The bodily resurrection of Jesus is central
to the Christian message and defending it maintains the integrity
of the Bible as accurate and life challenging.
Without going in to the vast number of reasons for discounting
Cameron’s theory (and it is only a theory even though
he may present it as fact), a number of salient points need
to be made. Three key points discredit the Jesus tomb theory.
Firstly, given that the tomb was discovered in 1980, almost
30 years ago, why was it not then considered in scholarly
circles as the tomb of Jesus? The fact that it was discounted
when discovered provides compelling evidence that it is still
not the tomb of Jesus Christ and his family. Why now do we
have an about face and all of a sudden, the tomb that was
once thought of as not belonging to the family of Jesus of
Nazareth, is now the Jesus family tomb, and the subject of
a startling evidential documentary? This alone raises serious
doubts about the veracity of Cameron’s claims.
A further compelling point is that if Jesus’ body was
moved from His original tomb and eventually located in the
new tomb in an ossuary, the disciples would surely have known.
In fact, they must have been heavily involved in the conspiracy.
Why then would they have gone on to face persecution and eventual
martyrdom knowing that the whole thing was a hoax? It simply
does not make any sense. Rather, they would simply have gone
back to their previous lives as followers of numerous other
pseudo-messiahs had done previously. But not this time. The
powerful, changed lives of the disciples post-resurrection
provide further evidence that Jesus was in fact raised from
the dead as the Bible claims.
A final point relates to the ossuary of James, the half brother
of Jesus, and head of the Jerusalem church. The James ossuary
supposedly went missing from the Jesus family tomb and was
discovered again in an antiquities store. Interestingly, analysis
of a photograph dates to the 1970s. How could the James ossuary,
photographed in the 1970s, have gone missing form a tomb that
was not discovered until 1980? Further, Eusebius the historian,
places the tomb of James near the temple mount, a location
nowhere near the supposed Jesus family tomb. I could go on
with the numerous other evidences against this “discovery”
being the tomb of Jesus Christ, but would only be repeating
what is readily available form other sources. For now, the
point remains as to what we should do with this “discovery”.
"In
the final wash up, that’s what this is. Propaganda
for the Hollywood money-making machine. It just goes
to show that good television does not equal good theology."
|
Looking
into the evidence and data that refutes the claims of James
Cameron and his team, one feels some sort of admiration. It
takes a brave effort to present a documentary as truth when
it is an obviously flawed theory. This effort is truly worthy
of our respect. A Christian claim based on similar inconclusive
evidence would be hastily dismissed as propaganda. In the
final wash up, that’s what this is. Propaganda for the
Hollywood money-making machine. It just goes to show that
good television does not equal good theology.
To me, as a Bible-believing Christian, this is an opportunity
for faith to be strengthened. With a little research, some
reading, thoughtful meditation, and a willingness to learn,
one can come to realise that this new find is simply another
conspiracy aimed at undermining the cornerstone of the Christian
faith. Is it deliberate or is James Cameron simply misinformed?
Are he and his team simply reading into the facts what he
wants to find rather than interpreting the facts and evidence
in an unbiased manner? It is hard to know for sure which of
these options is true. But regardless, for Christians this
is an opportunity to become informed, and as the apostle Peter
said many years ago, be prepared to defend our faith and give
an account for the hope that is within us. This defending
the faith, apologetics as we know it, is not weak, but rather
forceful, deliberate, and reasoned, based on knowledge and
evidence, not hearsay or vague understanding.
The onus is on us as Christians to be informed, to research
and learn, and equip ourselves to be able to carry out this
charge in an effective way. The bottom line is that despite
the proposals of the documentary the Bible still holds true.
In the end, the claims of the Bible regarding the resurrection
of Jesus Christ are believable and solid, and there is still
a lack of compelling evidence to believe otherwise. If this
doesn’t strengthen faith then what can?
This is an empowering way to look at what could be perceived
as a threat to the Christian faith. An opportunity to grow
in faith, to strengthen our belief in the teaching and truth
of the Bible, and the challenge of engaging with others as
we offer a reasoned defence of the present and future hope
that we have in Jesus Christ. Interestingly, the Christian
faith seems to wear more of these attacks than alternative
faiths and belief systems. Can this be perceived, albeit in
a paradoxical manner, as further support for the truth of
Christianity, an effort by the enemy of truth to bring distortion
and confusion? The frequency and nature of these attempts
to undermine the Christian belief system is in stark contrast
to similar attacks on other religions, which are sparse to
say the least. Whilst devotees of other faith systems can
be fanatical to an extreme, maybe Christians are just too
accommodating.
It will be interesting to see whether or not James Cameron
goes down with the ship as it sinks to the murky depths where
other similar unfounded conspiracy theories rest.
|