|
8th
July, 2007
MAL
FLETCHER
This
weekend saw the launch of the global ‘Live Earth’
concerts, run on seven continents and featuring 150 artists.
 |
A
BURNING ISSUE: Former US vice-president Al Gore is
the frontman for the Live Earth series of concerts.
PICTURE: LiveEarth.org
"When
so much is incessantly said and written about global
warming, especially in this age of wall-to-wall, 24/7
media news, people may soon begin to experience ‘activism
overload’."
|
Fronted
by former US Vice President and now ‘eco-warrior’
Al Gore, the concerts will feature past and present hit-makers,
streamed live to the world.
Scientists in many fields agree that we’ve got to change
the way we use the earth’s finite resources. We have
to find new ways to fuel the lifestyles and industries of
tomorrow.
The big question is, not whether we should be concerned about
the environment, but how will we fuel the future without destroying
the environment? And how can we do this without turning the
important issue of global environmental change into just another
political football?
Bob Geldof has already said that he thinks ‘Live Earth’
will do more harm than good - especially as powering such
a huge enterprise will doubtless lead to the production of
enormous amounts of greenhouse gases.
There’s another point to watch, too. When so much is
incessantly said and written about global warming, especially
in this age of wall-to-wall, 24/7 media news, people may soon
begin to experience ‘activism overload’.
Charities have often warned of ‘appeal overload’,
in the wake of major natural disasters such as the Asian tsunami.
It seems that people can only take so much bad news and ‘awareness-raising’
before they turn off.
When you’ve seen concerts for this and concerts for
that, with one celebrity telling you to support this cause
and another promoting something else, you may end up thinking
it’s all too much. In the end, what organisers had hoped
would be a cry for revolution becomes a sigh of resignation:
'Whatever!’.
We also need to beware of turning the issue of global warming
into the next ‘Y2K’.
I’m sure you remember that one: scientists and others
warning us of potential disaster in the wake of computer-meltdown
as digital clocks registered the beginning of the new millennium.
Some very reputable people were predicting global catastrophe,
with airliners falling from the sky and power grids falling
apart. Of course, nothing of the kind happened.
When it comes to issues concerning the environment, we can’t
afford to be complacent. But we shouldn’t let fear overtake
our pursuit of more information, or the proper use of the
often limited data we already have.
Fear can be manipulated. Science can be politicised and sensationalised
to serve interests other than those of pure research. If knowledge
is power, it is sometimes misused - usually in the name of
public security.
It is precisely because environmental issues are so important
that we can’t allow them to be hijacked in a sensationalist
fashion, which usually ends up backfiring.
"For the church of the 21st century," said The Archbishop
of Canterbury, "Good ecology is not an optional extra
but a matter of justice. It is...central to what it means
to be a Christian."
Some people think that the Christian Church has only recently
formed opinions on ecology. The fact is, Christians have often
been at the forefront of the call for ecological responsibility
- and their involvement goes back centuries, long before the
word ‘ecology’ even existed.
That’s because a Christian response to these issues
is not based on political expediency or even social responsibility;
it is grounded in the teaching of the Bible.
The Biblical Psalmist said "the earth is the Lord's and
everything in it". As God is the creator of the cosmos,
it ultimately belongs to him. The Psalms also tell us that
"the highest heavens belong to the Lord; but the earth
He has given to men". God has gifted the earth to us,
but it is ours to lease, we don’t own it freehold.
"There’s
a twofold responsibility here: we should act as overseers
of God’s creation, but in a way that will preserve,
protect and care for what He has made."
|
This
is reflected in the very first chapters of Genesis. God blessed
humankind and told them to "be fruitful, multiply, fill
the earth and subdue it". He told them to "have
dominion" over other living creatures (Genesis 1:28).
God also told the first humans to "till the earth and
to keep it" (Genesis 2:15).
There’s a twofold responsibility here: we should act
as overseers of God’s creation, but in a way that will
preserve, protect and care for what He has made.
Theologian John Scott says that we are like the ambassadors
of a King who has left us to rule his domain on his behalf.
Our dominion is not a synonym for domination, let alone destruction.
It’s not based on exploitation, either, but on co-operation
with the processes of nature. We cultivate what is already
in nature; and God has made nature fruitful so that it responds
to our efforts.
When it comes to how we treat the environment, we are accountable
not just to ourselves, but to God.
Study the Old Testament, and you’ll find that God placed
limitations on people’s ownership of land - and He gave
clear instructions about how it should be used to help the
poor. God’s law made it clear that all land should be
used in a way that pleased him, because He owns it.
Most modern ecology talks mainly about the earth’s survival.
But the Scriptures go a step further; they talk more about
redemption - not just for human beings but for the whole of
creation (cf. Romans 8:19, 21).
The Bible opens in Genesis with God creating the heavens and
the earth and seeing that they are good. The Bible ends with
the promise that the whole cosmos will renewed one day with
the coming of a new heaven and a new earth. In between, we
have the fallen world as we know it today - the ambiguous
world with all its shades of good and evil. But the emphasis
is one of hope.
There’s no room for complacency. Each of us must do
all we can to bring out the best in God’s world.
If fuelling the future means that we make radical changes
to our lifestyles, we should make them. But we should do so
without succumbing to the power of sensationalist hype, or
taking our eyes off an even bigger issue for the environment
- the soul of man.
"The
biggest enemy to the natural world is not environmental
degradation, it is human nature. We find it easier
to subdue the earth than to discipline ourselves."
|
The
biggest enemy to the natural world is not environmental degradation,
it is human nature. We find it easier to subdue the earth
than to discipline ourselves.
We
need to find ways to become better stewards of God’s
world, but we also need to declare and model His salvation
plan for the inner man.
Mal
Fletcher looked at the issue of fuelling the future and the
viability of some of the alternatives to traditonal fuels
in a recent TV film for the EDGES series. You can see the
full 30-minute film at edges.tv.
Reproduced
with permission from www.nextwaveonline.com.
Copyright Mal Fletcher 2007.
~
www.liveearth.org
|